MUSEUMS & SOCIETY 2034: TRENDS AND POTENTIAL FUTURES

Additional Comments on Part I, "The Changing Face of America"

 

From Susie Wilkening of Reach Advisors: 

About 18 months ago, my colleague, Sally Johnstone, and I met for coffee.  We both had a burning question.  Why do young women put rhinestones on their cell phones?

 

While that doesn't seem like an earth-shattering question (and has little to do with the changing demographics in America), it put us on a path to ask a lot of questions about young women today.  Because while we were noticing little things, like blinged-up cell phones, we were also noticing some big things.

 

Such as young women being nearly 50% more likely than young men to graduate from college.

 

Then, a few weeks later, new data was released indicating that young women in their 20s were starting to out-earn young men.

 

And if the gender gap in educational attainment, and pay, continues, well, we believe that will have a tremendous impact on American society.

 

For college-educated women in their 20s, already some tensions are rising due to this gender disparity.  Women tend to settle down with their educational peers, yet there are significantly fewer men with similar attainment levels.  And "dating down" (that is the official phrase, we could not make that up!) is posing new tensions and challenges to relationships.

 

But we want to know what this will mean for museums.

 

First, long-term, this is good news for museums.  Since museum tend to attract well-educated visitors, and since women tend to make leisure time choices for the families and constitute the majority of adult visitors to museums, having a larger pool of potential visitors should mean positive attendance growth (and positive membership growth) for those museums that tune in to this shift, and the needs of these young women.

 

Yet there may also be some challenges.  Although most young mothers with college degrees do work outside the home, young parents who do stay home with children, whether part-time or full-time (or even flex-time) are significantly more likely to be mothers.  If women are more likely to be the primary breadwinners, does that mean a future of more stay-at-home dads?  For museums that serve moms with preschoolers in large numbers, such as children’s museums but also zoos and aquariums, this may be a challenge as young men are much less likely to visit museums.  Will these stay-at-home dads choose the park over the children’s museum?   How can we reach these young men and engage them in museums as well?

 

And then there is where this trend might merge with the aging of America.  While young parents are in the workforce, they may be relying on their (recently retired) parents to help with that child care.  Grandparents tend to take grandchildren to a wider variety of museums than parents, which is good news for museums of all types.  But, on the flip side, children’s museums may need to increase their efforts to engage seniors (and consider senior accessibility issues at greater levels than in the past).  Seating helps.

 

Additionally, adults in their teens and early twenties tend to be tighter with their Boomer parents than prior generations were with their parents.  When these young adults become parents, there is no reason to think that this closeness will diminish.  Indeed, when these young adults become parents, many will be seeking activities that can involve all three generations.  Multi-generational activities will take on a greater importance, and museums are in an excellent position to build on this desire. 

 

Looking forward 25 years, however, moves us past these humps.  In 25 years, young adults of today will largely be parents of children ranging from elementary school to college age.  And in 2034 we will begin talking about what the great-grandchildren of Boomers will be like as parents . . . and museum visitors! 

From James Chung of Reach Advisors: 

One of the things I didn’t realize growing up is how my life has been a bit of a Petri dish representing some fundamental changes in the composition of the American population. My father came to this country to pursue his Ph.D. in the early 1960s, leaving behind my mother and older brother for a few years while he completed his studies, in preparation for a return to Korea and his family. But during that time, the U.S. Congress passed a landmark bill that President Kennedy had pushed and President Johnson signed into law, the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965. This may be one of the most revolutionary pieces of legislation that hardly anyone has heard of. 

 

Before that, immigration visas were distributed based on the demographic breakdown of immigrants established by the 1920 Census, meaning that most immigrants came from Northern Europe. All the sudden, the 1965 legislation established a preference for educated professionals with skills in short supply in the US . . . regardless of their country of origin. As a direct result of that change, I was born in Louisiana in 1966. And as a result of that legislation, America set a course down what is perhaps the biggest demographic shift in this country’s history.

 

As we look forward 25 years, the U.S. Census Bureau projects that America’s population will grow from 300 million to 400 million people. But none of that growth will be in the Caucasian population, which will see virtually zero growth. So where will the growth come from? The Census Bureau projects that we’ll see an increasing population of African Americans and American Indians. The Asian population will almost double in 25 years. And the Hispanic population will more than double in 25 years. But what’s the racial composition of the group projected to see the highest growth rate over the next 25 years? Mixed race. 

 

So I sit back and marvel at how much legislative decisions can impact America over the course of decades. Who would have projected, 25 years ago, that we’d see a mixed-race president win by an electoral landslide? And on a personal note, I delight every day in seeing how my half-Korean, quarter-Irish, quarter-Italian son and daughter are not a Petri dish of change, but are simply representative of what America is today, and will be increasingly in the future.  

 


The Center for the Future of Museums is an initative of the American Association of Museums
© 2009 American Association of Museums